Why are there so many “modern” versions of Shakespeare’s plays?
There are plenty of great books that don’t need translated versions. We don’t look for easier versions of Dickens, Hawthorne, Melville, or Fitzgerald (or at least, I hope we don’t.) But re-doing Shakespeare seems to be a favorite sport of publishers.
In a way, we can trace it back to Nahum Tate in the 1680′s and Thomas Bowdler in 1818, but they had totally different agendas than today’s creators. Tate wanted happy endings and Bowdler wanted to clean up the naughty bits.[I'll talk about them in my next post.]
We at the Folger have a standard answer when someone asks us what we think of “modern” versions of Shakespeare’s texts:
“IF YOU’RE NOT GOING TO USE SHAKESPEARE’S WORDS, DON’T DO SHAKESPEARE.”
Why dumb down all those beautiful words and images for the sake of making it easier? We’ve found that if you’re teaching Shakespeare in an active, performance-based approach, the language becomes less of on obstacle.
It’s the words that matter. Here’s an example of a passage from R&J which I’ve written with an interlinear version with the No Fear version:
Shakespeare: Oh, she doth teach the torches to burn bright!
No Fear: Oh, she shows the torches how to burn bright!
Shakespeare: It seems she hangs upon the cheek of night
No Fear: She stands out against the darkness
Shakespeare: Like a rich jewel in an Ethiope’s ear,
No Fear: like a jeweled earring hanging against the cheek of an African.
Shakespeare: Beauty too rich for use, for earth too dear.
No Fear: Her beauty is too good for this world; she’s too beautiful to die and be buried.
Shakespeare: So shows a snowy dove trooping with crows As yonder lady o’er her fellows shows.
No Fear: She outshines the other women like a white dove in the middle of a flock of crows.
Shakespeare: The measure done, I’ll watch her place of stand,
No Fear: When this dance is over, I’ll see where she stands
Shakespeare: And, touching hers, make blessèd my rude hand.
No Fear: and then I’ll touch her hand with my rough and ugly one.
Shakespeare: Did my heart love till now?
No Fear: Did my heart ever love anyone before this moment?
Shakespeare: Forswear it, sight!
No Fear: My eyes were liars, then
Shakespeare: For I ne’er saw true beauty till this night.
No Fear: because I never saw true beauty before tonight.
See the difference? Post your comments below as to the effect of the translation.
I almost hesitate to mention more of these, but they are worth discussing here. The following are for the print empaired student:
- If your students find reading Cliff’s Notes too difficult, Cliff has a better idea. They’ve boiled the plays down to 5-minute videos with ridiculous animation.
- The Shakespeare Made Easy videos boil the plays down to 2-minute versions, but are pretty awful.
- I do like the Folger videos that we’ve made, both the Insider’s Guides and the One-minute versions.
But back to print. Here are the candidates:
- Kent Richmond has created what he calls “verse translations” of several plays and shows why his versions are superior to what he calls the “dumbed down prose versions.” Here’s his translation of the Prologue from R&J.
- No Fear Shakespeare is part of Spark Notes. Here’s their parallel-text version of the same Prologue.
- Barrons have moved on from their Shakespeare Made Easy series with the death of their author, Alan Durband. They now have a series called Simply Shakespeare which seems equally bad.
- There’s also a series of Shakespeare Novels by Paul Illidge. Here’s the opening line from Macbeth: “A summer storm moves on over the barren and deserted countryside of Scotland during the Middle Ages, leaving the rain-soaked fields cloaked in clouds of fog.” Oh my.
I won’t get into the manga and graphic versions of the plays, most of which retain the original language and are quite good.
One of my students recently said to me, “You have some strong opinions.” Yes, I do, but if you feel that there’s room for these translations in your class, I encourage you to post your comments below.